Venue guide
Every conference and journal track from the lab's deadline workbook, with tier, CORE rank, acceptance rate, whether it needs a user study, and where the next edition is. Dates are month and day only, since these repeat at roughly the same point each year. Click any row for page limits, notification and camera-ready dates, the areas it covers and why it is relevant.
Loading…
| Venue | Track | Deadline | Abstract | Pages | User study | Fit | HCI | Tier | CORE | Accept | Attendance | Size / yr | Next event |
|---|
Journals only
The 52 journals from the workbook, with the metrics conferences do not have — impact factor, CiteScore and h5 index — plus how you actually submit. Click a row for the submission system, review process and turnaround, open-access policy and any fee.
| Journal | Publisher | Tier | Impact factor | CiteScore | h5 (% of CHI) | Fit | HCI | User study | Pages | How to submit | Intake |
|---|
Which venue for which area
Built from the area tags in the workbook. The first line is where the workbook marks that area a core topic (gold is Tier 1). Generalist venues like CHI, DIS and UIST are tagged as partial on nearly every area rather than core, so the Tier 1 venues that also cover it are listed underneath.
| Area | Venues that treat it as a core topic |
|---|
Source: in your iCloud Conference Deadlines
folder. The page is generated from that workbook, so the spreadsheet stays the one place you
edit; re-export and the page follows.
Fit is computed, not from the workbook. Your Fit_Score
column is empty, so the page derives it: the area tags the workbook gives each venue,
weighted towards the lab's own topics (smartwatch 1.0, mobile 0.8, human-AI 0.8,
visualization 0.6, accessibility 0.5; a “partial” tag counts half), plus the HCI
relevance rating, all multiplied by a tier factor so a weak venue tagged across many
areas cannot outrank a strong one. The result is scaled so the closest-fitting venue
in the list scores 5 — 5 means best fit here, not perfect fit.
Fill in Fit_Score in the spreadsheet and the page will use your number instead.
Attendance comes from the workbook's presentation mode. “In person*” means in person with remote allowed only by exception; the exact wording is in the expanded row. Pages and acceptance are shortened in the table and shown in full there too.
On the passcode: it is checked in the browser, so anyone who views the page source can read it, and the data file sits at a plain URL beside the page. It keeps this out of casual sight and out of search results; it is not real access control.
Not every row is dated. Rolling journals show Rolling and tracks whose call is not out yet show not announced; both stay visible under “upcoming only”. Venues the workbook marks discontinued are left out.